• Not a member?    Join ACC
About ACC
  • Resources
    • Search the Library
    • Contracts Portal
    • Compliance Portal
    • Survey Portal
    • ACC Alliance
    • Membership Directory
    • Member-to-Member
  • Education
    • ACC Annual Meeting
    • In-Person Education
    • Online Education
  • Membership
    • Join / Renew
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Types of Membership
    • Eligibility Requirements
    • FAQs
  • ACC Docket
    • From Around the World
    • Online Exclusives
    • Video Archive
    • The Magazine
  • Advocacy
    • About ACC Advocacy
    • Campaigns
    • Take Action
    • Filings & Decisions
    • Legal Strategies Blog
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Advocacy Events
  • Careers
  • Networking Opportunities
  • eGroups
  • Member Directory  –
  • Committees  –
  • Chapters  –
  • CLOs  –
  • Networking Opportunities
  • About ACC Advocacy
  • Issues
  • Take Action
  • Filings
  • Legal Strategies Blog
  • Advocacy Resources
  • Advocacy Events

Should the Privilege Protect Antitrust Compliance Policies?

Categories: Attorney Client Privilege / Legal Strategies Blog Posted on October 20, 2014 by Rick Stolpner

Earlier this month, a judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held that an antitrust compliance policy, prepared by counsel in response to a request for legal advice, but circulated to all of the employees of the company, is not protected under the attorney-client privilege doctrine. Because this was an issue of first impression in the Third Circuit, the district court had to look to other courts to reach its decision. Unfortunately, given the United States Supreme Court’s [erroneous] decision in Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter, this decision cannot be immediately appealed in order to get the Third Circuit’s view.

Nevertheless, the decision raises a number of interesting questions in privilege jurisprudence, including, but not limited to, (1) whether circulating an otherwise-confidential document to all employees deprives it of privilege protection; (2) whether the development of a compliance policy can be considered the provision of legal advice; (3) whether privilege protection should only extend to legal advice that leads to a decision by a client; and (4) whether privilege protection can extend to legal advice not communicating confidential information.

ACC disagrees with the district court’s decision in a number of respects, but the lack of immediate appeal leaves us little ability to correct it at the next level. That said, we would love to hear what you think after you take a look. The decision is available at this link.  Enjoy!

Right to Practice Rules by

Legal Strategies Blog

  • ACC and Cozen O’Connor Hold CLO Roundtable in New York

    On November 17, ACC Advocacy, along with Cozen O’Connor,... Continue reading →

  • Advocacy Award Winners Recognized at 2016 Australian In-house Lawyer Awards

    On November 17, 2016, representatives of the ACC Australia Legal... Continue reading →

  • Washington Supreme Court Holds Attorney Client Privilege Doesn’t Apply to Former Corporate Employees

    In an October 20 ruling of great concern to... Continue reading →

Filings & Decisions

  • ACC Files Comments with Australian Legal Services Council

    On November 8, ACC and its Australia chapter filed... Continue reading →

  • FILING UPDATE: ACC’s Stance against Internal Law Firm Privilege Rejected by New York Court of Appeals

    ACC’s stance against internal law firm privilege was rejected... Continue reading →

Advocacy Resources

  • ACC Comments to ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 Working Group — Inbound Foreign Lawyers

    In comments to the ABA ethics commission, ACC recommends... Continue reading →

  • Webcast: Enhancing the Audit Committee Report: A Call to Action

    Through the release of Enhancing the Audit Committee Report:... Continue reading →

Advocacy Events

  • Prosecuted for Providing Advice of Counsel: An Insider’s Perspective
    Date:  10/03/2014
    Location:  St. Paul, Minnesota

    In 2010, the government targeted Lauren Stevens for allegedly... Continue reading →

  • Emerging Issues in Litigation from the In-House Counsel Point of View
    Date:  09/16/2014
    Location:  San Francisco, CA

    In an open and interactive session, senior in-house litigation... Continue reading →

  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • Twitter
  • Resources
  • Search Library
  • Membership Directory
  • Member-to-Member
  • ACC Alliance
  • ACC Docket
  • Contracts Portal
  • Compliance Portal
  • Global Resource Providers
  • Survey Portal
  • Reprint Request
  • Education
  • Annual Meeting
  • Business Education
  • Executive Leadership
  • In-Person Education
  • Online Education
  • Networking
  • Chapters
  • Committees
  • eGroups
  • Event Calendar
  • Membership
  • Join / Renew
  • Types of Membership
  • Eligibility Requirements
  • Benefits of Membership
  • Membership FAQs
  • Audience
  • Chief Legal Officers
  • New to In-house
  • Law Department Executive Leaders
  • About ACC
  • Marketing Opportunities
  • Legal
  • Board of Directors
  • Newsroom
  • Site Map
  • Initiatives
  • ACC Value Challenge
  • Advocacy
  • Diversity
  • Pro Bono
  • ACC Foundation
Contact Us

©Copyright 1998-2014 — Association of Corporate Counsel — All rights reserved.