• Not a member?    Join ACC
About ACC
  • Resources
    • Search the Library
    • Contracts Portal
    • Compliance Portal
    • Survey Portal
    • ACC Alliance
    • Membership Directory
    • Member-to-Member
  • Education
    • ACC Annual Meeting
    • In-Person Education
    • Online Education
  • Membership
    • Join / Renew
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Types of Membership
    • Eligibility Requirements
    • FAQs
  • ACC Docket
    • From Around the World
    • Online Exclusives
    • Video Archive
    • The Magazine
  • Advocacy
    • About ACC Advocacy
    • Campaigns
    • Take Action
    • Filings & Decisions
    • Legal Strategies Blog
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Advocacy Events
  • Careers
  • Networking Opportunities
  • eGroups
  • Member Directory  –
  • Committees  –
  • Chapters  –
  • CLOs  –
  • Networking Opportunities
  • About ACC Advocacy
  • Issues
  • Take Action
  • Filings
  • Legal Strategies Blog
  • Advocacy Resources
  • Advocacy Events

D.C. Circuit Got It Right

Categories: Attorney Client Privilege / Legal Strategies Blog Posted on October 20, 2014 by Rick Stolpner

C. Evan Stewart has published a provocative commentary in the New York Law Journal, arguing that the D.C. Circuit undermined privilege protection with its decision in June. For those of you that have been following this case, that argument might seem a bit counter-intuitive, given the almost-universal praise for the decision by those concerned about the eroding protection for confidential communications in the corporate context. Stewart’s thesis is simple: The D.C. Circuit over-protected privilege (by mis-citing relevant precedent), which will lead to a judicial backlash when companies seek to hide otherwise-relevant communications from prying eyes.

Quite simply, Stewart is wrong about the significance of the appellate decision. Not only does the opinion make clear that the district court’s imposition of a second-class citizen status on in-house counsel is unwarranted and incorrect as a matter of law, it also amply demonstrates that the panel is quite familiar with privilege and work product protection doctrine.

Stewart’s principal complaint is that communications with non-lawyers were wrongly protected. However, he doesn’t mention that the court of appeals only protected communications that were conducted at the direction of a lawyer and for the purpose of seeking legal advice. It is well-settled law that such communications are protected.

Right to Practice Rules by

Legal Strategies Blog

  • ACC and Cozen O’Connor Hold CLO Roundtable in New York

    On November 17, ACC Advocacy, along with Cozen O’Connor,... Continue reading →

  • Advocacy Award Winners Recognized at 2016 Australian In-house Lawyer Awards

    On November 17, 2016, representatives of the ACC Australia Legal... Continue reading →

  • Washington Supreme Court Holds Attorney Client Privilege Doesn’t Apply to Former Corporate Employees

    In an October 20 ruling of great concern to... Continue reading →

Filings & Decisions

  • ACC Files Comments with Australian Legal Services Council

    On November 8, ACC and its Australia chapter filed... Continue reading →

  • FILING UPDATE: ACC’s Stance against Internal Law Firm Privilege Rejected by New York Court of Appeals

    ACC’s stance against internal law firm privilege was rejected... Continue reading →

Advocacy Resources

  • ACC Comments to ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 Working Group — Inbound Foreign Lawyers

    In comments to the ABA ethics commission, ACC recommends... Continue reading →

  • Webcast: Enhancing the Audit Committee Report: A Call to Action

    Through the release of Enhancing the Audit Committee Report:... Continue reading →

Advocacy Events

  • Prosecuted for Providing Advice of Counsel: An Insider’s Perspective
    Date:  10/03/2014
    Location:  St. Paul, Minnesota

    In 2010, the government targeted Lauren Stevens for allegedly... Continue reading →

  • Emerging Issues in Litigation from the In-House Counsel Point of View
    Date:  09/16/2014
    Location:  San Francisco, CA

    In an open and interactive session, senior in-house litigation... Continue reading →

  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • Twitter
  • Resources
  • Search Library
  • Membership Directory
  • Member-to-Member
  • ACC Alliance
  • ACC Docket
  • Contracts Portal
  • Compliance Portal
  • Global Resource Providers
  • Survey Portal
  • Reprint Request
  • Education
  • Annual Meeting
  • Business Education
  • Executive Leadership
  • In-Person Education
  • Online Education
  • Networking
  • Chapters
  • Committees
  • eGroups
  • Event Calendar
  • Membership
  • Join / Renew
  • Types of Membership
  • Eligibility Requirements
  • Benefits of Membership
  • Membership FAQs
  • Audience
  • Chief Legal Officers
  • New to In-house
  • Law Department Executive Leaders
  • About ACC
  • Marketing Opportunities
  • Legal
  • Board of Directors
  • Newsroom
  • Site Map
  • Initiatives
  • ACC Value Challenge
  • Advocacy
  • Diversity
  • Pro Bono
  • ACC Foundation
Contact Us

©Copyright 1998-2014 — Association of Corporate Counsel — All rights reserved.