• Not a member?    Join ACC
About ACC
  • Resources
    • Search the Library
    • Contracts Portal
    • Compliance Portal
    • Survey Portal
    • ACC Alliance
    • Membership Directory
    • Member-to-Member
  • Education
    • ACC Annual Meeting
    • In-Person Education
    • Online Education
  • Membership
    • Join / Renew
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Types of Membership
    • Eligibility Requirements
    • FAQs
  • ACC Docket
    • From Around the World
    • Online Exclusives
    • Video Archive
    • The Magazine
  • Advocacy
    • About ACC Advocacy
    • Campaigns
    • Take Action
    • Filings & Decisions
    • Legal Strategies Blog
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Advocacy Events
  • Careers
  • Networking Opportunities
  • eGroups
  • Member Directory  –
  • Committees  –
  • Chapters  –
  • CLOs  –
  • Networking Opportunities
  • About ACC Advocacy
  • Issues
  • Take Action
  • Filings
  • Legal Strategies Blog
  • Advocacy Resources
  • Advocacy Events

ACC Protests Higher Fees for Iowa’s In-house Counsel

Categories: Legal Strategies Blog Posted on October 4, 2013 by JD White

By Kristi Holzer and Henry Marquard

Today, ACC and its Iowa Chapter protested a proposal that could raise fees for in-house lawyers from $25 per year to as much as $140. In a letter to the Iowa Supreme Court, we wrote that “the clients of in-house counsel will never benefit from the Client Security Trust Fund,” which will receive the extra money.

The clients of in-house lawyers are their employers, and they are sophisticated. These organizations know they can fire rogue in-house lawyers not just from a specific case, but also from a salaried job and livelihood. Not surprisingly, ACC has found no instance in any publicly available source where an employer of an in-house counsel has tried to tap Iowa’s Client Security Trust Fund.

One group of Iowa’s in-house lawyers might need to pay two or even three times more than other Iowa in-house lawyers. Iowa in-house lawyers who have law licenses from elsewhere and who have registered to practice in Iowa already pay a $200 fee. The proposal may force them to pay another $200, plus an additional possible $200 after five years if they seek to obtain Iowa law licenses. Extracting such punitive fees from Iowa’s registered in-house lawyers serves no good purpose.

Iowa’s in-house lawyers already pay fees — to take the bar, to waive in to the state and to support the operations of the continued legal education commission. Those fees at least have some link to the professional development of in-house lawyers. Raising fees for the client trust fund won’t do that. We hope that the Iowa Supreme Court will agree that Iowa’s in-house lawyers should not serve as revenue sources to fund general programs that lack links to in-house counseling.

Kristi Holzer is the President of the Iowa Chapter of ACC, and Henry Marquard is a member of the Chapter’s Board of Directors.

Tagged: Chapter, Client Trust Fund, CommentLetter, in-house fees, Iowa Chapter.

Right to Practice Rules by

Legal Strategies Blog

  • ACC and Cozen O’Connor Hold CLO Roundtable in New York

    On November 17, ACC Advocacy, along with Cozen O’Connor,... Continue reading →

  • Advocacy Award Winners Recognized at 2016 Australian In-house Lawyer Awards

    On November 17, 2016, representatives of the ACC Australia Legal... Continue reading →

  • Washington Supreme Court Holds Attorney Client Privilege Doesn’t Apply to Former Corporate Employees

    In an October 20 ruling of great concern to... Continue reading →

Filings & Decisions

  • ACC Files Comments with Australian Legal Services Council

    On November 8, ACC and its Australia chapter filed... Continue reading →

  • FILING UPDATE: ACC’s Stance against Internal Law Firm Privilege Rejected by New York Court of Appeals

    ACC’s stance against internal law firm privilege was rejected... Continue reading →

Advocacy Resources

  • ACC Comments to ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 Working Group — Inbound Foreign Lawyers

    In comments to the ABA ethics commission, ACC recommends... Continue reading →

  • Webcast: Enhancing the Audit Committee Report: A Call to Action

    Through the release of Enhancing the Audit Committee Report:... Continue reading →

Advocacy Events

  • Prosecuted for Providing Advice of Counsel: An Insider’s Perspective
    Date:  10/03/2014
    Location:  St. Paul, Minnesota

    In 2010, the government targeted Lauren Stevens for allegedly... Continue reading →

  • Emerging Issues in Litigation from the In-House Counsel Point of View
    Date:  09/16/2014
    Location:  San Francisco, CA

    In an open and interactive session, senior in-house litigation... Continue reading →

  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • Twitter
  • Resources
  • Search Library
  • Membership Directory
  • Member-to-Member
  • ACC Alliance
  • ACC Docket
  • Contracts Portal
  • Compliance Portal
  • Global Resource Providers
  • Survey Portal
  • Reprint Request
  • Education
  • Annual Meeting
  • Business Education
  • Executive Leadership
  • In-Person Education
  • Online Education
  • Networking
  • Chapters
  • Committees
  • eGroups
  • Event Calendar
  • Membership
  • Join / Renew
  • Types of Membership
  • Eligibility Requirements
  • Benefits of Membership
  • Membership FAQs
  • Audience
  • Chief Legal Officers
  • New to In-house
  • Law Department Executive Leaders
  • About ACC
  • Marketing Opportunities
  • Legal
  • Board of Directors
  • Newsroom
  • Site Map
  • Initiatives
  • ACC Value Challenge
  • Advocacy
  • Diversity
  • Pro Bono
  • ACC Foundation
Contact Us

©Copyright 1998-2014 — Association of Corporate Counsel — All rights reserved.